"How Costly Is Too Costly?"
Fri Feb 24th, 2006 at 09:27:16 AM EDT :: Iraq
Finding the tipping point for Vietnam - and for
Iraq.
TomDispatch has long attended to the "costs" of George Bush's decision
to invade Iraq - especially in human lives - both in terms of American troops
sent into action there and of the Iraqis who have suffered grievously. Less attention
has been paid here (and elsewhere) to the literal costs of the war, not just to
who is being bled, but to what is being bled dry. Mark Engler, who has previously
written on the business community and the war for TomDispatch, now takes up the
financial costs of this war and pursues the subject vigorously - considering possible
"tipping points" (in terms of how much is too much) for the American
public, the business community and the Bush administration. He does so, in the
context of our Vietnam experience with the same.
He concludes: "The fact of the matter is that the majority of the country
has already decided that the war in Iraq has become too costly. Americans have
rejected the prospect of funding a massive and prolonged occupation. In that sense,
we have already tipped ... What remains, then, is for the public to hold accountable
those who would carry forward the neoconservative crusade - to make their stance
a costly one in public life. What remains is for us to bring the political price
of war into line with the human and financial costs that we will continue to bear."
This piece confronts the ultimate Vietnam analogy.
|
|