TruthOut - Town Meeting
T O  needs your help

The Evidence Against the White House Doesn't Lie

By Jason Leopold

Fri Jul 14th, 2006 at 06:56:01 PM EDT :: Fitzgerald Investigation

I find it truly amazing that our mainstream media refuses to dig into the public record and report facts related to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation on the obsession within the Office of the Vice President to launch a smear campaign against former Ambassador Joseph Wilson. If you haven't already read the court documents, now would be a good time to read Fitzgerald's filings in the Scooter Libby criminal proceeding to get a real understanding of how Vice President Dick Cheney and others officials set out to discredit Wilson. One document that suggests White House culpability in the matter is a redacted transcript of Scooter Libby's grand jury testimony.

Read my latest story on the behind-the-scenes effort by the White House to discredit Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame.


Display:
------------------------------------------------------------
I know much of what you discussed in your latest article here has appeared, in pieces, in various articles you have written at this site over the last 8 months or so. But seeing it all together and presented by you really shows quite a case here about Cheney's obsession to discredit Wilson. Very impressive Jason.

And I suspect that Joe Wilson reads this site (my goodness, it was one of the few sites he sent his recent email to; and it is the only site that says Karl Rove was indicted).

So Joe, can you take a chance here and comment on Jason's recent article? Pretty close, eh. He's done a pretty impressive job considering he's just a two-bit reporter that the MSM won't touch with a 10 foot pole.

Come on Joe, take a chance. What do you think?

by Z man on Fri Jul 14th, 2006 at 09:53:17 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------
with reporters who actually do the investigative work and report what they find.  Kind of like the administration had a problem with the nation's intelligence community doing the same thing.  It's, you know, their media outlets and they get to decide what we get to know and what is the news, that is, despite their moral obligation to the people to act as watch dogs for us.  Dirty rotten sell outs, comes to mind.
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 07:41:35 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
I also find it truly amazing that the "Mainstream Media" hasn't dug into this further, especially since they seem to despise the President, Vice-President, and all things Conservative in General. Maybe they're still a little gun shy after seeing Dan Rather's career ruined due to propagating blatant lies against the President?!  Since Bush has been in office, the main "Obsession" by the media has been to demonize him.  No one cares about Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame!  Time to get a life. Take your family camping, go to a movie, or go to a ball game!

by smithxd2 on Fri Jul 14th, 2006 at 10:07:41 PM EDT
------------------------------------------------------------
THE MAIN STREET MEDIA ARE SO "IN LOVE" WITH THE "BUSHIES," that they can hardly tolerate anything Democratic.  With the exception of Keith Olbermann, and possibly Lou Dobbs, they practically worship at the alter of Bush's feet, and stifle any possible urge they might have to utter a negative comment against him!  You must be one of those PAID RIGHT-WING PROPAGANDISTS, sent out to do your "dirty work" on our liberal internet sites.  There are "armys" of them, "TROLLING" our "highways," to no avail.  Alas, the "REPUKES" are wasting their money!

by krose on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 01:16:56 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
"Krose",
You seem really angry.  Maybe you should take me up on my advice:  Get out for the weekend, go fishin, hiking, camping, or something.  All that anger and name-calling isn't healthy for you.  And to answer your question, I'm only paid as a Psychiatric Nurse, not by propagandists, Believe it or not.  And I'm sorry, I didn't know this sight was restricted to "Liberals" only.  

by smithxd2 on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 02:51:46 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
and no one taught you how to spell.  hmmmm

isn't it embarrassing when you go to work and can't even really spell ?  people might think you are as smart as  you like to pretend.
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 03:34:09 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
And when I commented that spelling was important, you all dismissed me.

What comes around, goes around.

Cheers,
-- Furrener
by furrener on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 12:29:41 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
spelling IS important but for my own self, personally I rarely bring it up as it is not really a hallmark of clear thought or intelligence.  Many brilliant people simply cannot spell.
My sick lil tactic is to insult the weak with it when they insult others over things just as inane.

Sorry for your trouble here but I apparently missed the whole brouhaha you are talking about.

Just keep plugging away and I have learned (again, me myself, not you or anyone else) ... that I try to pay more attention to the idea than the spelling; if not I'd have to dismiss almost everyone on line.
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 10:32:31 AM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
I find it funny that you say "I try to pay more attention to the idea than the spelling, if not I'd have to dismiss almost everyone on line", but one post earlier state:

"isn't it embarrassing when you go to work and can't even really spell ?  people might think you are as smart as  you like to pretend."

I have been a reader of TO for quite some time now, but the attitude of many of the "regulars" on this blog is (at best) disgusting.

You say that "I try to pay more attention to the idea than the spelling" - so do it!  A very valid point was made - and God forbid somebody made a spelling error.  I am honestly amazed that some of the posters on this site can even see their monitors with their noses so far up in the air.

This is an open, public forum, and one would think that somebody might be able to come here and have an intelligent, open discussion even if their view differs from yours.

Since the whole Jason/Rove scandal, you (collectively) accuse anybody who disagrees with you of being a Republican spy, and many other things much more inflammatory.

Although I have always been a supporter of TO - it deeply saddens me to see how childish many of the "regulars" (and Heaven forbid, you're not a "regular" on here unless you've been posting since Moses was a baby!) have become.  Is throwing mud (or worse) the only way to win an argument these days?

Sad.

by UnbiasedObserver on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 06:10:38 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
who's arguing??

what's your agenda??

never mind.  let me guess.

never mind.

i won't bother.

maybe you should have read ALLLL the posts before you commented because I had my reasons none of which I have to explain to you but ... whatevaaaaaaaaa

did you really JOIN UP just to bait me??

wow, what a compliment.

nice to meet you, too.
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 06:16:54 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

you know you are like the DOZENTH person to sign your azz up here just to try to stalk me around and insult me?? probably many more than that, I'm just thinking of the last several weeks. ROFMFAO!!!!

Thrivin on the attention and all that.

go back to your kind, now.  The regulars here are anything BUT childish and I applaud your ability to single me out as a collective insulter as I am anything but.

go back to your kind, now.

gladly.  Thanks for the attention.  I have learned to count on it from you scared weirdos.    

Found 1 results.
1) Ignorant. [3.00 / 0] Replies: 1
posted by UnbiasedObserver on 07/17/2006 06:10:38 PM EDT
attached to The Evidence Against the White House Doesn't Lie
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 06:20:19 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
What valid point are you referring to?  
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 10:03:03 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
I think it's difficult not to respond emotionally to a ststement as absurd as the one about the mainstream media being out to get Bush from the start, after they gave him the chance to steal the election of 2000 by trashing Gore and then giving Bushco a pass on just about anything for a long time. Some people on the right just cant see the absurdity of the notion of the "liberal media"
Of course if it really were a "liberal media" it would more closelynapproximate the values of the majority of Americans. I think propaganda outlets like Fox "News" etc. have created an utterly false perception of what it means to be liberal in the minds of many otherwise liberal Americans who actually tend to support our positions, nut have been turned away from the word liberal. We should help them to see that there aren't any real cobservatives left. It's a choice of massive government spending either to benifit mainly the already wealthy as is now occuring or massive spending and appropriate taxation to primarily benifit the rest of us. Of course the latter course is the only sustainable course, since the increasing concentration of wealth and growth of poverty will eventually even wreck the fortunes of the wealthy.

Peacedog
by Peacedog (louisrue@charter.net) on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 03:32:43 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Peacedog,

Thank you for responding to the original post - some people actually believe that there is such thing as a "liberal media" - and it is the responsibility of sites such as TO to dispel those sort of myths.  That is what originally attracted me here and that is what should be provided: information, instead of humiliation.

@eyeswideopen:  I must apologize for centering you out with my post - believe it or not I am not some sort of Republican insider sent to discredit TO.  It just seems that more and more some of the posters here are more concentrated on personal attacks rather than helping somebody who may be uninformed or mistaken see the truth.

@lizbitchwitch:  The point which I was referring to was that these days this site seems to be restricted to "Liberals" only.  While I do understand (and appreciate) that this IS one of the few truly Liberal places left in this world, IMO it should be a place for education for those who have been misguided - how many people do you think vote Republican simply because all of the news they get has a Republican spin on it?  My guess is many.  If it is this site's intention to restrict access to only those who share the same political lean, then that would truly be unfortunate.  Name-calling has always been more of a Republican thing, no?

Anyway, just my $0.02.

by UnbiasedObserver on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 06:05:00 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent points
Peacedog
by Peacedog (louisrue@charter.net) on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 08:01:23 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------

Well you have a point Observer, but TO members like to say what they really think.  If that doesn't persuade partisans of the right, we're sorry.  But we're primarily concerned with truth---evidence, data, documentation---which we regard as persuasion enough for anybody who really wants to find answers.  Why water down the message for the sake of reaching those who don't want to honestly read and consider the evidence?

Sure the "liberal media" is a myth, but that doesn't mean TO has any responsibility to dispel it by going centrist.  As you point out, there are too few news outlets representing the left.  Many TO readers like me are glad to have a place where we can speak the truth, and damn the consequences.

You have a perfect right to read TO and post here, and we have a right to give you hell if your arguments don't hold up or you seem to have ulterior motives.  You call yourself a longtime reader but we've never heard of you, so you'll have to forgive us if we look askance at your posts until we know you better.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 10:24:11 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
While I agree that personal attacks and name calling are unproductive and I would also like to state I resemble that remark or at least that accusation, Our name calling and launching personal attacks aren't half as disgusting as what these people support.

If you think that Smythxd's comments came complete with a valid point, I am here to tell you that you are wrong.  Additionally, he certainly didn't come here for any sort of intelligent discourse.  His comments were riddled with sarcasm of the neo-conned kind and I am sorry you missed it.  

Had he wanted conversation or had he wanted to make a point, he would have given us just one good example of the media demonizing the President and administration.  However, he didn't.  Instead he did just the opposite by citing the Dan Rather case.  It served as a snickering reminder in all our faces that the "liberal media" has been called to order and Dan Rather served as the example for anyone else who cares to demonize (either rightly or wrongly) the President and/or any of his administration officials.  He reiterated the potential threat that looms over ANYONE's head that dares to speak out or against the actions of the President.  

Nope, he came he not because of the conversation or sharing of information but to incite flame wars and illicit emotional responses.  Unlike you, though, I find people like him and their continued support disgusting and our reaction, both emotional and more tame and tactful, human and normal.

for anyone to expect anything other than strong emotion which may erupt into some tongue lashings and name calling over these types of shit and run visits from these types of people is absurd.  While it would be nice if we could all immitate Ghandi and Buddah and the Dali Llamma in our reactions, most of us have not evolved that far yet, we are just regular human beings trying to deal with the presence of people like that as humanely as possible under the circumstance.  

It is rather difficult for most people here to deal with these kinds of people on a respectful, tolerant level when the truth of the matter is, it is their support which has enabled and allowed that which we stand in very strong opposition to.  I mean for Christ's sake Observer, if these people would not continue to support and oblige those leading our country and representing all of us, just think what we could effectively end.  As far as I am concerned they are just as guilty if not more guilty for the war crimes committed, the unecessary bloodshed of untold tens of thousands (TENS OF THOUSANDS) of innocent people; Lies, decept and the list goes on.  For God's sake, because of people like this, people are being tortured, some to death.  WE are talking TORTURE and your disgusted with us?  We are talking about unecessary blood shed of children, women and men in two different countries and the bloodshed of our own sons and daughters and loved ones in the military , not theirs but ours.  We are talking election fraud, the evaporation and eradication of our personal freedoms and civil liberties right on down the freakin line to our inalienable rights.  We are talking about whole American cities drowning and thousands drowning with it but not before they spent three days begging for help and waiting for that which never came and we are talking the blatant indifference displayed by our leaders.  I am the one who is disgusted, it makes me want to puke and I will be GODDAMNED if I will be nice to them....it is NOT okay what they do and the behaviors they support.  Their bloody hands are leaving prints eveywhere they go and they don't even see it.

And I admire your lasting hope about changing minds with the simple truth and the right information presented in the right way and I also despise your willingness to blame the media for thier choices.  While the media is definately guilty of swaying the minds initially, I don't believe they can go past their responsibility into each and every one of us's own personal responsibility for the information we receive and what we choose to believe.

Their ain't no more people on the fence, there, my friend.  With very few exceptions everyone is where they are and there is little to nothing that any of us can do about it.  We can package the truth up and give it to them in the most seductive paper and bow and guess what, they won't open it.  They won't hear the truth and they won't see the truth because they have CHOOSEN not to.  They aren't looking for the truth, they are looking for validation.  It's too late in the game and too many facts have come to smack everyone of is in the face despite the special game the media plays.  They are where they are because they want to be, not because their poor little souls were conned by the so called "liberal media" or anyone else.  Taht excuse has run dry a long time ago.

And while I absolutely agree with Peace dog in his wise observations, I read his post much differently then you did.  What I heard him say was more like a commiseration than anything.  He understands how emotionally attached the human being with a soul and those who take personal responsibility and hard it is not to respond to certain terms framed by these bastards like "liberal Media" is.  He also reminds us that these evil doers spending our tax dollars, and representing all of us, committing these fouls against humanity and altrocities against mankind along with their paid pundits and the rest of their cheerleading squad whom have sold their souls out for whatever reason are much fewer than they appear to be.  And I agree, their job is to look like the majority but we all know that they are the minority.  Nonetheless that number although the minority is still too goddamned high for me to swallow and if it's okay with you, Miss manners, I don't really care to be polite to those people that behave in such ways as the supporters and dirty rotten sell outs now belonging and enabling the coninued haneous crimes and that which creates massive suffering, death and unecessary bloodshed.  I am certainly not tolerant of those who refuse to see the truth even though you can't freakin miss it at this point unless your retarded and those who continue to be indifferent to their own leaders actions despite the death and the suffering in for a freakin group hug.  It's NOT OKAY with me and I will be goddamned if I will pretend it is or treat this disgusting display of inhumaness with anything other then the response it deserves.   I would spit on the ground in front of them if I could to show my utter disgust toward them and what they do, who they support and therefore that which they are guilty of doing themselves.  Think of it as tough love because the bleeding heart liberal technique did them no good.  Sorry you find the reaction to such disgraces disgusting rather than that which illicits such response.  
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 02:02:08 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Will we condemn the crimes, or merely point a finger at the "intemperance" of those who rail against them?

If I'm ever in a lifeboat Liz, I want you right there with me.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Thu Jul 20th, 2006 at 08:42:43 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Just one comment I would like to make:

You wrote: "...I also despise your willingness to blame the media for thier choices.  While the media is definately guilty of swaying the minds initially, I don't believe they can go past their responsibility into each and every one of us's own personal responsibility for the information we receive and what we choose to believe"

I just wanted to perhaps clarify my intentions with that statement.  I did not intend to imply that the media has the power to tell us what to think - what I was attempting to get at was that there are many who are uninformed (or worse - apathetic), who just know what they hear from the MSM, and do not get both sides of the story.  Are those the type of people who would read TO?  Perhaps not.  Perhaps my optimism is a fault - but I would like to believe that minds can be changed and enlightened by the power of information.

As I said - maybe I'm too opimistic.  I certainly admire and respect your resolve, but I (perhaps foolishly) believe that the minds of the ignorant can be changed through fact and education.

Thank you for your post.

by UnbiasedObserver on Thu Jul 20th, 2006 at 10:24:04 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
That was a helluva commentary, Liz. I am esentially in agreement with you. I do however, believe the corporate media is quite adept at distorting reality and unfortunatly most Americans may still rely on the MSM for their information. i woulkd also like for everyone to take more responsibility for their sources but dont expect it to happen. Thus media reform such as reimposition of the Fairness Doctrine is essential.

Anyway, thanks for that post.
Peacedog
by Peacedog (louisrue@charter.net) on Fri Jul 28th, 2006 at 11:47:55 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
What's the matter with you? Just close your eyes to the what's going on around you. Ignore the truth about what Bush has done to the economy, our Contitution, our rights, our poor, our soldiers, our schools, our Social Security System, our ability to respond to national emergencies, our health care system, our standing in the world, the courts, the right to have our votes actually counted, gas prices, our debt to and dependence on China, our acceptance of the use of torture, the ever-increasing tension in the Middle East, the threat of using nukes in Iran. Go fishing, have fun! Live it up! Bread and circus! Go buy stuff! Just look the other way, it's easy!! If smith can do it, you can too! Even Liberals can do it! So, just take a deep breath, trust Bush Corp. and hang loose. Chill out!
Look in the mirror and repeat the "Golden Rule".
by fulano on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 05:36:14 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
I forgot that he lied to get us into an unnecessary war, has spied on us....and then outed a CIA agent. So what!? You can forget it, too! No big deal!
Look in the mirror and repeat the "Golden Rule".
by fulano on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 05:43:48 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Please!  Just a day or two!  Maybe just a walk in the park with your family.  How about one day off a week, and six really serious ones. You can't fight for what you believe in if you are too exhausted!

by smithxd2 on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 07:24:46 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
You sure seem fresh, smitty

Look in the mirror and repeat the "Golden Rule".
by fulano on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 07:51:42 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
on to something, smitty.  After all, Bush is so good at ignoring warning signs of impending disasters or attacks while he's on one of his so many vacations. And look how relaxed he is!  What, me worry?! Have a beer, or more.
Look in the mirror and repeat the "Golden Rule".
by fulano on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 07:58:53 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't think about the beer part, but that sounds good once in a while too.  I really don't think frequent vacations are beneficial for anyone to be productive, especially for the leader of our country.  I was talking about balance.  I think there needs to be balance in our govt and in our personal lives, both of which seldom happens.  Believe it or not, there are many things/issues that I disagree with about this President, past Presidents, and I'm sure with future leaders, whether they be Liberal, Conservative, or Other.  I've always had a problem with Presidents and our other "Leaders" in Washington taking their vacations on our (Taxpayers) dime.  By the way, I like and totally agree with your closing comment about the "Golden Rule".  Goes hand in hand with one of my favorites:  "Judge Not Lest You Be Judged" Matthew 7:1.

by smithxd2 on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 12:52:48 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
which is forbidden in James chap 1:6.  You make judgemental statements as "No one cares about Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame!"  Obviously we care about the injustices inflicked upon this family.  You assume and imply that we don't spend quality time with our families, yet, you know none of us here and contradicts your reference to:  "Judge Not Lest You Be Judged" Matthew 7:1.  

If you were indeed advocating balance then you should have said in an humble fashion instead of the pompous and offensive,(remember the Golden Rule, woe be unto those who offend) manner in which you presented your view.  My advice to you is "Get the moat out of your own eyes."

"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 01:08:30 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
emah1
Thanks for the suggestion.  I apologize.  One thing I do need to work on is trying not to judge others.  I don't claim to be sinless.  It is usually inaccurate to use absolute statements such as "No one" "Nobody", "Everybody", etc.  I personally think that whatever "Injustices" have been done, if any, in the case of Joe and Valerie pale in comparison to daily injustices happening to folks all around us locally and in our daily routines, jobs, neighborhoods, etc.  Joe and Val seem to still have plenty of cash, a roof (Or roofs) over their heads, food in their stomachs,  etc.  Seems to me that the whole thing has been over-politicized because it involves Big Fish and the Beltway.  Maybe it's just me (At least in this forum) that really doesn't care too much about the Joe and Valerie saga.  I still think that just about all of us (Including myself) can never spend enough time with our families, loved ones, etc.  Its been a while since I've taken my son fishing.  Maybe I'll get my license renewed and take him this weekend.

by smithxd2 on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 05:39:57 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Hey, this is really off topic; it's about the 14th ammendment, and deals with issues of the rights of the immigrant..an issue we have discussed in the past. So, natually, I thought of you.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/07/21/14th_amendment/
Look in the mirror and repeat the "Golden Rule".
by fulano on Fri Jul 21st, 2006 at 07:56:18 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
about me and yes, I love the 14th Amend.  Sooooooo, you "naturally" thought of me...eh.
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 09:00:41 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't fight for what you believe in if you are too exhausted!"

-- trying to exhaust us?

by Mutternich on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 09:47:58 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
To drop the badgering understanding of what our government and our responsibility is out doing to not only us, but others we share this earth with.  We are responsible co-creators who actually care about the suffering that our government creates in our name.  You obviously punch that clock and it's all over for you - back to good ole American living and denying for you.  Unfortunately, too many people have lost their humanity with practises that you suggest.  "just forget about it...go have some fun"  Like telling a mother whose child has gone missing, just forget about it...it they torture the kid, there is nothing you can do anyway, go get drunk and have some fun why don't you."  Glad to know there is more compassion and humanity here and less people like you frequenting this forum, as it makes me feel better about what choices I make and where I go and who I am attracted to.  
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 08:00:46 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
as steve beshakus - remember it?
Oft Evil Will Shall Evil Mar - Theoden
by Not An American (naa-truthout@hotmail.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 10:51:12 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was someone else - I'm trying to think ...but yes, I remember someone like that always saying 'get away from the computer" go for a hike or get outside - or some shit like that.....But after awhile, NAA, all of them sound the same and the spew is all shit to me anyway.  When they can start coming up with something creative for once, for christ's sake, then maybe, oh just maybe, I will remember who they are or at least who they call themselves in whatever incarnation they happen to be -

At least invited neocon is somewhat creative - he can come up with different techniques for his approach but not that you and Cassandra waste any time chasin him off again...but I will give him that.  

Aint it funny, too, how they all disappeared and as soon as Jason speaks they come a runnin again.  Boy the more they do that, the more I am positive that everything that comes out of Jason's mouth is truth...hehehehe....
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 12:06:15 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
should have waited to here to say EXACTLY !!!

have they never heard of reverse psychology or are they THAT afraid of jason ??? hehe
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 06:36:20 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
one would think they have heard of it...but one ust never knows these days.  With a vet in charge of our health in this country - one just never knows.
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 06:57:40 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------

First it was: "Joe Wilson is a liar, no crimes were committed, Plame wasn't really covert, perjury isn't that significant."

Then it was:  "Leopold and Ash lied, TruthOut is finished, you guys are all in denial."

Then it was: "Fitzgerald is a neocon plant, the investigation is dead."

Then it was: "Cheney/Libby bad, Bush/Rove not so bad, this scandal is old news."

Now it appears to be: "The Wilsons are gold diggers trying to cash in on their 15 minutes of fame in an election year."

Stay tuned for the next talking point.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 10:52:58 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
you said it all
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 06:35:22 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------

        Our government is only concerned with one thing, putting as much money in their pockets while the're in office.Bush and his cronies have not done one real thing to help the common american except to make his life harder.

by soverign on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 04:45:05 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
down cars - he never fixes;  just like the wedding planner who has never been married and just like the psychiatric nurse whose own ability to see clearly and state a rational and reasonable case to back up their own ideas is severely lacking.  Spending time with all the crazies makes you a little prone to that type, eh?  By the way you must love the current state of health care in this country, being a nurse and all, eh?  How's about that medicare and that prescription plan Bush talked all the infirm and elderly into signing up for.  Has your hospital figured out all the glitches the government is having with their computer systems yet?  You must love the lack of funding going toward the mentally disabled and the Big drug companies turning into another big business.  You just got to love someone who is in a profession of service like nursing who can defend those who work so hard to hurt those they work to help.  Can you make sense out of that one, there, psychiatric nurse?  
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 07:55:56 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
is a national disgrace. "That guy must have escaped from a mental institution" is a joke that's been meaningless for the last 40 years or more -- people who desperately need help and know it are lined up around the block hoping to get in.

Public services are always first on the chopping block; private-plan coverage of mental illness is twice as skimpy as private medical coverage and private facilities admit patients, suck their coverage dry and kick them out on the street as bad or worse than when they went in.

But universal coverage? Oh, no, that's socialism! Can't have that, especially when America, America, God shed his grace on thee! is spending herself bankrupt in this sleazy war of avarice the neocons itched for forever and finally got an excuse for with 9/11.

But I take comfort, knowing that a caring person like smithxd2 is helping those lucky souls -- the ones lucky enough to be getting some kind of care, that is.

by Mutternich on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 07:51:02 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
are the only game in town. Fitz has disappeared for the moment. Even a potential Bush pardon of all involved will not affect the Wilson's case. Maybe the Wilson case will get to the truth and expose the lies of this administration. So I, for one, like these two fronts (even if one has been forced underground for awhile). MSM, overall, has failed us here.

by Z man on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 06:21:19 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
I am glad to see the case filed. Plame and Wilson are looking at the case realistically. The case will be challenged, and even thrown out of the courts many times at all layers of the system. I expect an appeal to Supreme Court, perhaps more than once. Watch the Federal government pick up Cheney's legal fees.

Despite all this the case is good. Ultimately the case will not be tried. The only question is how long until the case is terminated in such a way that the Wilson's cannot fight the termination. I hope the Wilson's set up a legal offense fund, or someone with the pockets of Richarch Mellon Scaife is backing them. Richard Mellon Scaife hates Democrats and is the primary money behind Whitewater / Lewinsky lawyers, the Federalist Society, and many conservative causes and think tanks.

Practice tolerance, kindness and charity.
by lwelsch (LWelsch@gmail.com) on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 06:31:56 AM EDT http://home.comcast.net/~PoliticalThoughts/index.html
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
"I hope the Wilsons set up a legal offense fund...."

They did:

http://www.wilsonsupport.org

by Mutternich on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 10:02:40 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
So has the grand jury and so has this administration once again.  And my fellow americans for the most part continue to agree to lower their expectations of those that represent us lower and lower beyond recognition.  Expectations create disappointments I suppose....
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 08:03:12 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Remember I told you?  All someone has to do to raise those public expectations is volunteer one of those Clinton oral office jobs to Bush;)
"You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you have to concentrate on." George W. Bush
by YUCA (msealesk@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 01:56:07 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you probably did...I know some people told me so but hey, one has gotta have some hope.  I should have known better.  He is part of the system.  I know treason is a hard one to prove and at least he stirred up shit - and maybe, he did do all that he could do - without being in the army, that is (ha - remember the army recruiting song )  I dunno....I am disappointed again and I hate getting used to it.  I wish someone would surprise us.  At least Libby is now out of the picture and Delay 2 down and about a million more to go....We think we can we think we can we think we can - come on every body - chug a long...we think we can - wait we can we can ----- ah we did??
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 07:02:22 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
who knows anymore.  I was just being facetious about your comment on people having lower expectations of their representatives.  But if something "morally" inapropriate (as viewed by the right) were to be committed by our little president, such as Clinton's friendship with Monica, you would see how fast a call for impeachment would come in.  Forget about all the killings and all the wars and the growth of fascism.  No one has noticed yet.
"You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you have to concentrate on." George W. Bush
by YUCA (msealesk@yahoo.com) on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 04:25:56 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
not yet anyway.

Some kind of constitutional crisis has occurred and there is a state of legal limbo at the moment.  We may or may not ever hear excactly what happened, depending on who wins the dispute.  I'll admit the deck is stacked.  But there are a LOT of people in government who respect the law and the truth and there will be leaking like crazy if there's any information to be had.  Don't lose hope yet.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 10:59:03 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
"Some kind of constitutional crisis has occurred..."

I agree. It has, for the moment, got him locked down. He's one of the good guys. And he cares about finding the truth.

by Z man on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 11:17:37 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
But the Wilson's have launched their civil suit.  Doesn't that mean the criminal prosecution rests?  I'm not sure but I think that is how it works.  Why didn't he go after Rove and why couldn't he make an announcement now?  I don't know, you guys, he was once appointed by Bush for some other thing....He is part of the system, you know?  I am broken hearted too but I just don't know.  
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 01:23:10 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
The Wilsons were waiting as long as they could, because any progress made by Fitz would be to their advantage in court. But finally they had to act because of the statute of limitations.  That's a shame but I'm glad they're pursuing it and really, how could it miss?

We know Fitz's investigation isn't over yet because if it were, he'd make an announcement.  And, perhaps even more telling, Gonzales and company would trumpet the announcement from every rooftop.  So far their silence is deafening.

If you're discouraged maybe you'll enjoy reading these commentaries by Marcia Macmullan and Citizen Spook, on why they can't fire Fitzgerald:

http://www.yuricareport.com/Corruption/BushNoPowerToFireProsecutor.html

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 03:24:55 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Since Bush has been in office, the main "Obsession" by the media has been to demonize him.

...Only since they realized his war of aggression has turned out so badly they really can't spin it his way anymore.

And even now, they're not "demonizing" him -- just fessing up to a few pangs of buyer's remorse.

by Mutternich on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 04:13:21 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
unsubstantiated and completely ridiculous comments with some solid evidence?  Like what in the hell are you talking about?  

Bush isn't responsible for anything, is he?  He isn't responsible for the war in Iraq, it was the intelligence fault.  He isn't responsible for the torture, it is the soldier's fault.  He isn't responsible for the double agent he welcomed with open arms and was fairly warned that he was loyal to Iran, it was the double agent's fault.  Bush is not responsible for Libby Lewis's treasonous activities while serving under he and his administration - as the President defended him....it was the prosecuters fault.  Bush isn't responsible for ignoring a grieving woman who lost her son in Iraq, he didn't want to talk to her because she already figured that man out and he knew it.  He is not responsible for the fact that we have no Bin Laden - but because of our desperate attempt to serve Bin Laden justice, we are fighting two expensive, deadly, blood shedding wars but Bush will tell you all about how Bin Laden is no priority now that he is making his bucks on his war racketeering...but that isn't his fault.  how was he to know that weapons manufacturing with the Bin Laden's would be so goddamned profitable?  Right.  I got a question for you....what has happened under his watch that is his fault and can you name one thing the man has done or tried to do which has benefited the American people (and not just the elite wealthy and one percent of the population?)  I doubt you can...but have at it....And good luck!  Don't hurt yourself trying to come up with something...
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 07:48:55 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
The only substantive individual within the Bush Administration was Colin Powell.  Since he left the Bush Administration there is no one of  substance left. Just a bunch of radical ideologues and right wing fanatics. It was disclosed early on that Colin Powell had access to this information on a flight with the Presidential Pretender known as George W. Bush on AF1 where options to discredit Wilson were openly discussed.  
Time will eventually reveal to us if I am correct.  

by GhostWriter2 (ogana2@hotmail.com) on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 12:48:13 AM EDT
------------------------------------------------------------
While he was less of a menace and crook and liar - he still was one.  He should have refused to play their game, but he didn't.  He lied before the entire world...and he helped pull us into war.  It's a little late now for him to be calling the pot black when we already have it all figured out and were counting on him to make a stand long before now.  As far as I am concerned, while he may not be in the inner circle of the fray - he still did their dirty deeds too long and too many of them to be wiped clean of his responsibility.  Fuck him.
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 08:06:41 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
because he knew better.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 11:01:56 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
is the biggest disappointment of this administration. We were all counting on him to provide the voice of reason and stand up to these stupid, stupid people.

He let up down. He had a brain. I will never forgive him for what he has done to our country. Never. He knew better.

And his silence now is so disgusting. How can he even look in a mirror?

by Z man on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 08:24:37 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Colin Powell...

Mai Lai coverup...VietNam

Highway of Death...GW1

A good man, but on whose side?
Oft Evil Will Shall Evil Mar - Theoden
by Not An American (naa-truthout@hotmail.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 08:50:47 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
He will decieve and play their games too -However, it was my understanding that he was out of the loop for most security issues except those they wanted him to play a key role in decivin us about so it is possible....who knows.  All I know is the guy is not to be trusted either and hopefully, leopold understood that too.  If he can lie to an entire world in order to assist others in creating unecessary bloodshed then why would he lie to a reporter for these criminals he went to bed with?  hmmmm, interesting theory.
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 02:56:58 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
"Colin Powell is the biggest disappointment of this administration. We were all counting on him to provide the voice of reason and stand up to these stupid, stupid people."

Ya know, I was ragging on him to somebody the other day, and they made the comment: "Imagine how much worse it might have been had he not been there to slow them down."

All things considered... a valid point, and one I hadn't thought of. That he wasn't "on board" for a long time was illustrated quite nicely on a recent PBS special (whose title I unfortunately can't recall just now).

That's not to say I'm not still stung by his ultimate actions. I'm so old, I remember when I would have liked to see him run for office, but I can't say that now.

by Dryad on Fri Jul 21st, 2006 at 11:05:25 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Another black man used by white men.  Unfortunately he was too stupid to see that that was what was happening.

I am not an American and I do not live in America.

by Tonybds on Wed Jul 26th, 2006 at 06:53:59 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
as stupid, or that he was another Black Man used by the White Man.
I personally think Colin Powell tried very hard to steer the administration away from the Iraq War, but he was up against a lot more than he could accomplish on his own.
Colin Powell is a Military Man, a war weathered Viet Nam Vet who learned from the tragedies he saw in that war and tried to keep us out of the Neoconservative move to pave the middle east by starting in iraq.
He was in a powerful position, and he knew he was only one voice against a multitude around him. He would have been kicked out of the club a lot sooner than he was had be just confessed his lack of confidence in the administration plan and exposed the efforts of Cheney and Rumsfeld to undermine the truth and depose Saddam - with their mushroom cloud rhetoric.
I know he continues to agonize about his U.N. speech. His heart was never in the premise for war. He knew it was a distraction away from any real war on terrorism, but alone he couldn't swing the war machine around. He just wasn't strong enough on his own against the likes of Cheney.
Weak in his resolve - maybe, but never stupid - and not an example of White's using Black's!

by Angelgabriel on Thu Jul 27th, 2006 at 05:44:43 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Triumph of the Authoritarians, by John W. Dean, Nixons former White House Council.
His writing poses an interesting and well researched finding on the evolution of the conservative movement over the past 40 years.
This has been posted out to TO subscribers, or another source to read this article would be the Boston Globe.
Seems to fit whats going on today to the letter!

by Angelgabriel on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 01:06:28 AM EDT
------------------------------------------------------------
that this article was written by Nixon's White House counsel. John Dean is truly a redeemed individual.

Yesterday the arrogant Mr. Novak declared the Wilsons' lawsuit will be dismissed. He is cut from the same cloth as the trolls in this thread. Yes, cowardly Bob and trolls, transforming a democratic republic into oppressive, despotic totalitarianism is hard, dirty work. My hat is off to you. You've sustained the level of hate and groupspeak of a terrorist organization, and remained truly on purpose, giving history the textbook examples of betrayal and cowardice which will more quickly alert patriots to the threat of one-party repression and the advance of unitarianism.

The free, democratic republic you destroy today, the people your wars kill, the free people you fight now, will all come back to haunt you tomorrow, and the day after and the day after. Messrs. Ash and Leopold, take a good, hard look at your critics. They are the sniveling, ignorant cowards I told you they are.

by Uranus on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 04:00:33 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Leopold has no credibility with me, not since his announcement, that was backed by TO, that Rove would be indicted.  Sorry.  Even if JL told me the sun was expected to rise in the east tomorrow morning, I would be the first one in my neighborhood looking in the other three directions at sunrise.

JL made TO look like RO...Rumors Out.  How embarassing for all progressives.

Hot tip: the sun is rising in the southwest tomorrow.  And GWB is going to be impeached because of his lies about Iraq!  (Source unknown.)

by at78rpm on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 12:16:23 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------
...So don't read him. Period. Problem solved. Have a nice day. :-}

by Mutternich on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 12:46:00 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
that makes anyone concerned about JL's credibility with you?  You're as irrevelant as the crack head standing on the corner...no ones cares him.
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 01:45:47 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
Even crack heads on the corner sometimes find themselves with a certain sense of superiority and some idea that their thoughts make it so.  So I guess we can't be too hard on it.  I for one, have made that very same mistake but usually I have something to substantiate my claims like WHY one is or isn't credible.  This one just says it like it is a matter of fact...he believes Rove and Rove's attorney over Leopold because why?  Don't ask me....
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 08:17:20 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter if you believe what he says or you don't.  it really doesn't matter who is credible in your eyes or not because despite what you think, it doesn't change the fact that he is credible.  he may have been set up and he may have been smeared by all those who have no respect for the people in our news media who step up to the plate, despite the looming threat issued and made on those who speak out against them and against their demands, but for those of us who can see the bravery and the real desire to do one's job despite the consequences that is inevitable, We are the people whose opinions really count...the rest of you can pretty much go to hell, as far as I am concerned.  

And see that is another thing....it doesn't matter much what I think about whose going to hell and whose going to heaven or even if there is such a place....what will be will be.  See how that works.  

PS DID ANYONE ASK THIS PERSON FOR THEIR OPINION???  Please raise your hands if you did....well I didn't see anyone raise their hands except to wave bye bye to you....Everyone wave!
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Sun Jul 16th, 2006 at 08:14:05 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
I don't.

His opinion is valid, it is substantiated by the fact that Leopold was wrong about the indictment.  You people pull this: "we've laid it out on the table" garbage, and claim others are lying, when you simply have no actual proof of anything you seem to be alleging.  The meeting was denied by all involved (AUSA wouldn't comment).  the indictment was never given.  the secret-squirrel indictment they pointed to was issued days after the alleged indictment was handed down.  Fitz never denied the statement that he had given the letter to rove's lawyer.  it's been more than a month since that occurred and still no indictment.

so those are some cards, they're on the table.  let's see yours.

all roads lead to Leopold was dead-wrong.  I'm not saying he's a liar.  He may be truthful generally.  but he's a reporter who's biggest hit was a miss, he apparently believed someone who lied to him and published his article without due diligence.  his credibility as a reporter is lower than bush's approval ratings.  

oh, you didn't ask for my opinion?  tough.
i'll post my opinion when i feel like it, get used to it.

by Thecla (jutspam@gmail.com) on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 12:10:53 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Luskin, his PR person, and Rove, have trashed TO. Numerous occasions and with key media hacks (similiar to what Rove pulled with the MSM press using that prostitute guy planted as part of the White House Press Core until he was "exposed"). They will do anything to show Jason's reporting is full of it. Any chance to do that they will jump at. Right? Of course.

So they have in their control the opportunity (it would cost them about 2 minutes of their time) to come down hard on TO. It would shut TO and Jason up. Big time. Big big time. TO would eat crow. People like you would shot from the roof tops. So what is it? "Let's nail TO once and for all". Please. What is it?

The letter.

Luskin claimed he received a letter/fax from Fitz indicating that Rove would likely not be indicted. Yet repeated requests to provide this have received all kinds of excuses from Luskin. Yet if it is provided and shown to disclose what Luskin has said, then TO eats crow.

Yet no letter is provided.

And who do you believe? You distrust Jason and TO and believe Luskin and Rove.

Where is the letter? The letter please.

Make sure when you reply to this you title your subject "EXCUSES". I wouldn't want to miss it.

by Z man on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 01:51:02 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
that's all you have?  to defend accusations of libel/slander, of falsely stating someone has been indicted?

You base your continued belief in something that has absolutely no evidence to support it on the fact that a lawyer didn't publish the letter he received on behalf of his client??

does not the silence of the prosecutor's office speak volumes to you all? why wouldn't he come out and say "i sent no such letter, whatsoever!"  

nothing, not a peep out of fitzgerald.  also, does it not concern you that Leopold is so partisan about this?  reporters should not be advocates.  read his latest bashing of the MSM on Novak.  He has clearly made credibility determinations for himself.  who is he to say that Novak is lying?  he should just be reporting what Novak says.  he could then point to other witnesses' dissents to that version.  he shouldn't be commenting on how Brit Hume or any other journalist "lapped up" anything.  that's not journalism.  that's agenda-driven propoganda.  sure, fox is bad, but don't claim you're reading some altruistic, pure, journalistic ethics-maven website that only cares about the truth.

you have no evidence, period.  you are the people accusing others, you produce evidence, those who disagree have no obligation to produce anything.

excuses, please.  your whole post is an excuse. let me sum up your current position:

  1. it's Rove's lawyer, obviously it's a lie.
  2. see? no letter, see point one.

really, that's pretty pathetic.  all other evidence has fallen to the wayside.

by Thecla (jutspam@gmail.com) on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 03:44:08 PM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
It is really very simple. You can do all the attacking you want. Just get us the letter. TO and Jason will write mea culpa's all over this site.

The letter please.

If they tell you it's not about the letter, it's about the letter.

by Z man on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 03:55:23 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
"something that has absolutely no evidence to support it"  --You mean, like Luskin's claim to have received a letter from Fitz?  Because that claim has no evidence to support it either.

Fitzgerald's silence does mean something, but none of us know what it means, including you.  The investigation is not yet ended because Fitz has not announced its end.  The lack of public announcement of indictments does not prove the absence of indictments.  (See our lengthy discussions of sealed indictments.)

A reporter's having opinions is not the same as being partisan.  Offering analysis of facts and statements is not the same thing as being partisan either.  Just because many reporters are blow-dried stenographic robots doesn't mean that's the best or most honest way to get the truth.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Wed Jul 19th, 2006 at 11:22:24 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
But at this point Leopold's "evidence" has proven not credible.  yes there are ifs and maybes we all don't know, but that is such a far cry from having any evidence that Rove was indicted that it's just not even professional to keep the charade going.

I also think it speaks volumes about Leopold's reputation that Rove's lawyer didn't publish the letter.  he didn't have to, cause the rest of the media (yes, even democratic partisan media) have already concluded that the whole Rove was indicted storyline has faded to nothing.

I guess the only real issue left, besides the letter (which I wouldn't produce either, if it was only satiate TO and Leopold), is when Fitz closes the investigation.  

it's only a matter of time at this point.

by Thecla (jutspam@gmail.com) on Fri Jul 21st, 2006 at 07:13:36 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
If they tell you it is not about the letter, it is about the letter. -god

by Z man on Fri Jul 21st, 2006 at 08:42:39 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------

The media's failure to do its job proves nothing about the Rove investigation---though it speaks volumes about the media.

"at this point Leopold's 'evidence' has proven not credible"  

Not so!  The evidence is secret so there's no proving anything, one way or the other, until something becomes public.  Jason's unproven assertions are just as credible as Robert Luskin's unproven assertions.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Fri Jul 21st, 2006 at 11:39:32 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
let's see that letter.

let's see it.

come ON FITZ ... make a believer of me
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 04:13:07 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
"oh, you didn't ask for my opinion?  tough.
i'll post my opinion when i feel like it, get used to it.

Somehow I don't think we'll really have to. Fifteen minutes of flame is all guys like you usually hang around for.


by Mutternich on Tue Jul 18th, 2006 at 04:34:20 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
You need to recognize that if you're going to post on TO, you better have something of substance to back up your hubris, because engaging in character assasination or playing the neocon disinformation game, is going to be nothing but a waste of your time.  
"You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you have to concentrate on." George W. Bush
by YUCA (msealesk@yahoo.com) on Mon Jul 17th, 2006 at 02:23:27 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
------------------------------------------------------------
for how anyone feels about this miscarriage of justice. If we really cared about how we appear to the rest of the world, we'd be out in the street demanding the whole crew be drawn and quartered in the public square. If we did, 90 percent of the world would say, "those Americans know what to do with lawbreakers."

Heh, we've discussed the many things that can happen to indictments, but no one has said what most likely happened: Fitzgerald attempted to tender the paperwork to Rove's lawyers (service by the prosecutor himself is a rare privilege), and some class individual like Addington or Gonzales probably told him they'd have his head cut off. BushCo likes complicated and invalid legal procedures as much as jungle love.

by Uranus on Thu Jul 20th, 2006 at 01:22:46 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------
most newspapers seem to have no idea we are in a war.

Wars.

They are way more worried about ....

what the hell ARE they worried about?

Not a DAMN thing.  Their paychex are signed by the GOP !

We have to get the GOP out of office and then take our newspapers back.  Or vice versa.

I think the first would be easiest.

Good on you, jason.  Send this column around to them all.
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Sat Jul 15th, 2006 at 02:11:30 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302

------------------------------------------------------------
A two-year investigation by a special prosecutor came up with nothing. Repeat - NOTHING.  Maybe you could count an indictment against a top Cheney aide, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, last year on charges of obstruction of justice and perjury.  But remember, it was the investigation that created the indictment, which was not even the subject of the special prosecutor's probe.  In other words, there was no crime committed until the investigation into that non-crime occurred, which then somehow created the crime. You figure it out.

A trial--if this ridiculous lawsuit even gets that far--will be an interesting one.  .  It's obvious that Plame and Wilson love the spotlight, as well, and not being particularly bright people they'll probably provide grist for the mill of the blogosphere and they will love it.

Liberals want to keep this story alive in spite of not getting their archenemy Karl Rove indicted.  The prosecutor tried, but being an honorable guy he realized--although he hasn't said it bluntly--that this CIA Leak Case was a lot of Hoodoo. You see, Democrat Party liberals are only interested in probing leaks that don't harm national security. You know--the ones that actually help the enemy and hurt the country.

Liberals and Jason Leopold. The same Jason who had the story of the secret indictment of Karl Rove. Still reporting, still hoping for some kind of indictment and absolutely no proof of what he writes. Yes, Jason, I do give you credit for tenacity. However, tenacity without truth becomes just distortion or at its worst deceit.

by Right (