t r u t h o u t || Rove offers to help Lieberman (seriously)

Rove offers to help Lieberman (seriously)

By WilliamPitt

Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 01:32:08 PM EDT :: Midterms 2006

Well, it took all of 12 hours.

Lieberman goes down to defeat in Connecticut, sounds for all the world like a petulant Republican while deriding "partisan politics" after an inter-party primary (someone please explain the physics of that one), and slaps aside the party he has belonged to for decades to run as an Independent. So much for all those DLC calls to "get behind the candidate" we've been hearing for so long.

The sun comes up on the ashes of Lieberman's political career, and lo and behold, here is Karl Rove offering his help. "According to a close Lieberman adviser," reports ABC News, "the President's political guru, Karl Rove, has reached out to the Lieberman camp with a message straight from the Oval Office: 'The boss wants to help. Whatever we can do, we will do.'"

Check out the rest of that linked article for yourselves. It is, in the end, not all that surprising.

Rove offers to help Lieberman (seriously)

------------------------------------------------------------

Too Weird

As bad as the kiss of Bush was, the kill of Karl Rove for a Democrat is like death. That this George Stephanopoulos blogging this does nothing but give credibility to the story. Former Democrat White House insider turned newsman is someone who an insider from Lieberman's camp might say something to. But why would Rove call? Poor Joe the guy is toast and Rove has the torch.

Practice tolerance, kindness and charity.
by lwelsch (LWelsch@gmail.com) on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 01:55:30 PM EDT http://home.comcast.net/~PoliticalThoughts/index.html

------------------------------------------------------------

The Kiss of Death.ummmmmmmmm

SMACK
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 02:04:31 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Good question: why would Rove call?

In spite of the denials that he offered help, why WOULD he call? The fact that he DID call lends credence to all those who have called Joe a Republican in disguise; the kiss was merely a public acknowledgement of a "brother" in fact as well as spirit and ideology.

I am thankful for the CT bravehearts whose vote made such a difference. In spite of the whining from Joe about hacking, stolen shrimp, and even trashing of campaign materials, these savvy voters were not fooled one bit.

Now MSM? That's another story altogether!

by WonderWoman on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 04:21:12 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Split the democratic vote

Good ole Joe L. promises to run as an Independent -- turned in the paperwork today. I'm sure the Republicans love that. This way the Democratic vote may very well be split and the Republicans can win CT. They're banking on some of Joe's loyal supporters to vote for him instead of the Democrat nominee, Lamont.

Divide and conquer. I bet "Invited NC" is loving this!
"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi
by earthymom on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:03:34 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Wow

We both posted this comment at the same time...eerily they are almost the same in context. I guess great minds work alike. Sorta like Joe and Karl.
To laugh is sublime
by Jokerone on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:06:20 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

Almost to the second!

And you are no "joke".
"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi
by earthymom on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:14:40 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Now if that's not the pot calling the kettle...

When a politician that you disagree with loses, and has complaints about underhanded, dirty, and illegal tricks, you call it whining? How could Joe lose? If the Republican powerhouse wanted him to win, wouldn't they just fix the voting machines? After all, that's what you accuse them of doing every time your guys lose. And, what is wrong with Joe running as an independent? If the Democratic party has swerved so far to the left that they can't support their former Vice-Presidential pick, don't you think that they are going to alienate many people? I see this as a win for the GOP. If Joe runs as an independent, he will have a good shot at winning. That's one less Demoncrat in the Senate.

by paidhack on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 07:44:43 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

And DeLay will stay on the ballot

So, call it even?
"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi
by earthymom on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 08:27:49 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
: ------------------------------------------------------------

You make a good point hack.

I'm not in favor of dirty tricks played on any campaign, or interference with any election. Candidates should win on their own merits, not with fraud. You will understand, however, if I do not immediately assume Lieberman's charges are true. If he has evidence, let him present it.
Karl Rove's favorite trick is to falsely and pre-emptively charge your opponent with doing whatever dirty trick your own side is doing. That way your opponent is caught off guard, and his counter-charges, when they come, will just sound lame.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 09:14:04 AM EDT
[ Parent ]
: ------------------------------------------------------------

RE: pot calling the kettle

How could Joe lose? If the Republican powerhouse wanted him to win, wouldn't they just fix the voting machines? Perhaps the voting machines were fixed. Since there is no exit poll data we will never know. The polls at the end had Lamont 6 percentage points ahead. The final vote tallies were 52 to 48 well withing the margin of error, but without exit polls one never knows. Changing 1 vote out of a 100 could just as easily lead to that 2% difference. Changes that small in close elections can have profound impacts and are hard as hell to detect. Who would have guessed two months ago Lieberman would have needed more help?

And, what is wrong with Joe running as an independent? Nothing is wrong, unless Joe want's to claim he is a Democrat. The issue is not Senator Lieberman running as an independent, the issue is when he does that then loyal Democrats should not support him. That is what being a member of a party is all about. What Senator Lieberman has not done is articulated a principle he is upholding by running as an independent other than Joe wants a job.

If the Democratic party has swerved so far to the left that they can't support their former Vice-Presidential pick, don't you think that they are going to alienate many people? Actually I think Senator Lieberman swung so far to the right he alienated many people.

I see this as a win for the GOP. Whatever turns you on. I see this as a battle for the soul of the democratic party.

Practice tolerance, kindness and charity.
by lwelsch (LWelsch@gmail.com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 09:38:19 AM EDT http://home.comcast.net/~PoliticalThoughts/index.html
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Poor Joe, My Great Aunt Fanny

Joe L, has either been an out and out infiltraitor for a long time, or he has been straddling that fence for too long, playing his own game and serving from both sides of the net.

So, he miscalculated, his foot slipped, and he came down on his cojones. I feel no sympathy for his pain!

A coup de grace by his best is the most he can expect.

Don't let him suffer, Karl, make it a clean shot!

by sirius99 (Aiman) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 01:09:09 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Rove is no fool...

...he knows a chance to exploit Liebracrats when he sees one. Yes we do have Democrats with chameleon like character- changing with the political winds, incapable of yielding to the winds of change. Rove simply smells the blood in the water.

Since some people continue to be confused about it, here's the Republican/Neo-Con power strategy in a nutshell. In order to win (or steal) an election your party has to have a clear majority of the votes. It you need to tamper with the voting machines the percentages have to be reasonably close. Where some states have voting machines and others don't, you only have to focus on the states that have the machines to affect the results of any national election in any country. In this country, if the public perceives that the election outcome is going to be close, you may only need to steal electoral votes from one or two states to steal the whole enchilada. This is what happened in Florida 2000 and Ohio in 2004.

The mechanics of stealing elections are firmly in place and apparently Democrats won't change those conditions anytime soon. Being the evil genius he is, Rove will just as soon play swing voting Democrats as hanging chads. In fact Liebracrats could become the best thing for Republicans since Independents.

The counter strategy is the temporary abolition of voting machines (until they can be made tamper proof) and the development of a Truth a Reconciliation Movement to investigate 9-11, the run-up to the Iraq War and the corporate malfeasance that creates no-bid contracts, war profiteering and mis-management of taxpayer revenues ($9 billion missing in Iraq for example). The public will support such a move and Rove has no counter strategy except to allow Cheney to promote more false flag operations like the one pulled last week in England.

Democrats who are part-time believers of the Bush Administration are the worse enemies of democracy. They fall for the fear and terror game every time. Rove must be proud
when he can thwart a revolution of thinking people on the brink of shattering his world of deceit. Fortunately, the people always win in the final analysis.

The man who has nothing he is prepared to die for, is not fit to live. (MLK Jr.)
by artforjustice on Sat Aug 12th, 2006 at 10:29:13 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Not surprising at all.

Well I ain't surprized at all. Look it's sheer genius really. If Lieberman can roost up enough support and split the Democratic vote...well then the GOP candidate might not even have to break a sweat to get elected. Call it the Nader effect if you like. It worked once, it can work again, and before you know it, a heavily dmeocratic state has been delivered to the republicans. It makes perfect sense and fits the Karl Rove divide and conquer playbook. Come on people, don't let the smooth taste fool you again. I personally believe it's a very petulant move on Lieberman's part and I'm glad the dems got rid of him, but all teeth haven't been pulled yet...ya better watch your back!
To laugh is sublime
by Jokerone on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:03:56 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

Fools

Either Joe L is a bigger fool than he at first appears, or (more probable) he's one of THEM and in on the game plan.

Anybody know what Joe's business ties are? What kind of "contract" or easy money will he get out of this? In this case I think it's prudent to follow the money.

Let's just hope the people of CT are not fooled.
"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi
by earthymom on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:11:09 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

It is interesting the way this is interpreted.

MSM is reporting that Lamont won because of Iraq, dislike of Bush and "far left liberal bloggers." However the NYT editorial attributes the win to "moderate" CT Democrats. It will be interesting to see who votes for whom - will Republicans cross over and vote for Joe? Will they vote for their own candidate? Will truly moderate Dems stay with Lamont or jump to Joe? Will the Dems let Rove split them apart and allow themselves to be "played"? Does Joe care about anybody but himself? (I can answer that one.)

I am receiving emails tonight from Wesley Clarke and other Democrats who are sending out petitions asking us to send Joe a message that we think he needs to gracefully admit defeat and get behind the winner, Lamont. I signed and sent on. I am also forwarding it to friends. Perhaps if Joe hears from a million or so ordinary Americans, he will realize that he is painting himself into the Republican party so fast, he'll never be able to salvage what might remain of his reputation.

by WonderWoman on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:46:36 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

I see it more as

whether people will follow their conscience rather than party affiliation

The major parties play into a two party system which maintains itself but in my opinion does not adequately represent the wishes of all of the people..it cant 2 options for a nation of 300 million?

In the broader picture of this nation...is Joe running bad?

I almost think that challenging the hegemony of the parties, or in fac t demonstrating thathegemony, might be worth more to the nation than the seat itself.

Assuming the blogosphere notices the irony above and beyond Lieberman himself.
The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. Edward R. Murrow
by Elegba (elegba@gmail.com) on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:55:40 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

I get your point.

I think the challenge of Lamont was like a third party challenge; Joe represented the status quo/in-team/old party and Lamont took him on. I'm not sure who Joe really represents now, running as an Independent. I guess we'll see if CT will actually divide into three groups or if the Republicans will use Joe as a wedge, in effect just maintaining the two-party setup. They could very well pull their weak Republican contender out, replace him with a stronger contender, split the Dems and then take CT back to red status. If so, Joe plays right into their hands. Or, they could rally behind Joe, pull off enough right wing Dems to vote for Joe, and put him back in office as their puppet. Either way, the Republicans win and either way, it's a two-party game.

I haven't heard much about the Independents in CT, have you? If there truly is a separate group of undecideds and Joe is their man, then his run as an Independent would appear to be (on the surface) legitimate. However, I have never trusted the man, so I would tend to doubt his rationale regardless of what it might be! Sorry!

by WonderWoman on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 06:12:39 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

from what I hear

CT has the highest percentage of independants in the nation which is why its viable..
In general people try to vote for the lesser of two evils in a two party system. Unless its so bad that they need to vote for a third party.
Overall I hope people dont lose sight of the broader issue while worrying about the candidates.
The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. Edward R. Murrow
by Elegba (elegba@gmail.com) on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 06:18:35 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Send me a copy of the petition!

Or ... tell me where you need to subscribe to get one.
moveon.org?

Thanks!
Mike

by mrogers2006 (mrogers2006@hotmail.com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 12:39:52 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

See if you can connect with this:

Wes Clark <info@securingamerica.com>

by WonderWoman on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 12:49:16 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Forget the MSM facts

The "Fact" is Americans are watching their Army being chewed up in an endless war, Iraq spinning into civil war, and our treasury being pillaged in the biggest money grab since the Brinks Job.

The People are pissed, and Joe L., the stinkin' toady war-mongering SOB, was fired BY THE PEOPLE! Or is that too hard for the MSM hacks to figure out.

The "far left Liberal bloggers" seem to be a lot more mainstream these days. Maybe the emails you received WW show that the Democrats are actually using their heads....for once.
"A slave is he who cannot speak his thoughts.": Euripides
by jbyopa (shaking.the.trees@hotmail.com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 04:56:26 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

No, he was fired by the left wing.

Joe no longer has support of his former party because of the left wing extremist groups trying to take over the Democratic party. If these groups succeed, the democrats will see history repeat itself. Remember McGovern? Remember the 1968 Democratic National Convention? It will happen again, and the GOP will win 5 of the next 6 presidential elections.
There was no referendum in this primary. Three incumbents lost their bids for re-election: Lieberman, who I think will win in November, good for the GOP; Cynthia "Cop-Slapper" McKinney, whose 9/11 conspiracy theories made her look like idiot, good for the GOP; and Joe Swartz (R) MI, who was nothing but a RINO, got beaten by a conservative challenger, also good for the GOP.

by paidhack on Fri Aug 11th, 2006 at 09:13:12 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Bloodtests for politicians

I love it; "Left wing extremists" taking over the Democratic Party. Meanwhile, the Republican Party is being taken over by a gang of religious crackpots trying to jumpstart the endtimes.
And in the middle, a lot of very angry people, watching our country being dragged down by an Administration that is slowly destroying our nation. Lieberman was and is an enabler of George Bush, and the more we see of Bush, his policies and his witlessness, the more his enablers will be tainted.

By the way, 1968 presents a valid comparison. Hubert Humphrey, an enabler of LBJ's war in VietNam, lost to Nixon. Humphrey was tainted by his stint as LBJ's VP. Nixon, at the apex of his career, presented a choce to voters, claiming he had a plan to end the war.
Sorry, but McGovern did not run until 1972. If the voters had known about Nixon's intrigues in 1972, as opposed to 1974, McGovern may have won. Of course, we will never know.

"A slave is he who cannot speak his thoughts.": Euripides
by jbyopa (shaking.the.trees@hotmail.com) on Fri Aug 11th, 2006 at 12:33:40 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

I know when McGovern ran...

but he lost running on a left wing ticket. Lost isn't the right word... he got wiped off the face of the political map.

by paidhack on Fri Aug 11th, 2006 at 02:39:14 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

Things change....

and shit happens. In retrospect, McGovern was a better choice.
"A slave is he who cannot speak his thoughts.": Euripides
by jbyopa (shaking.the.trees@hotmail.com) on Fri Aug 11th, 2006 at 09:33:18 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Rightyo! Joe!

The Republicans always come a running when they want to help (that is themselves, to yet another thing that belongs to the people) - Don't forget they helped other Independent/3rd party candadites make it on the ballot just ohhhh...last election and the one before that...nice people...eh? Well Joe Lieberman is a traitor...We want new faces - not the typical threats but no action democrats - not the dems who vote for something because their husband gets a multi million dollar contract out of it - uh hum...Feinstein and the Iraq war for instance...I hope Leapfrogman - serves as a huge lesson for any other candadites who don't pay attention to their constituents...they obviously have not been listening to the people...maybe now they can take the hundred dollar bills out of their ears and listen up - or get the hell out...
"For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead." Thomas Jefferson
by lizbitchwitch (saylinbackagin@yahoo.com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 03:49:21 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

now

I dont want Lieberman to win

But I will be interested in measuring the power of the Democratic machine as things play out over the next few weeks.

We will be able to see exactly what the weight of money and power thrown behind Lamont will do.

I wonder if people realize that we can actually watch someone try and compete againt the machine and see what happens to them.

A sitting Senator at that.

If he is totally crushed over the next few weeks what wil that say about the system on the whole and the power of the parties?

It wil certainly be an interesting experiment.
The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. Edward R. Murrow
by Elegba (elegba@gmail.com) on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:11:36 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

Very interesting indeed

"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi
by earthymom on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:15:17 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

its so rare

its only the third time in fifty years that a sitting senator has lost in the primaries...an amazing statistic...
Now I know what that says about the machine but now we can watch what happens when one goes against it...
We should all pay close attention.
(of course hoping that the better candidant wins in the end..whatever that means :)
The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. Edward R. Murrow
by Elegba (elegba@gmail.com) on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 05:41:01 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

rove's help

I can't help it. This is the second time I've read this today (the short version) and a laugh escapes me each time. I'm sure others were much more eloquent but ...... this is the best real laugh I had all day.

Thanks KARL!!!!!!!!!! (and wrp)
Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth.
by eyeswideopen (fairy_taletrash@yahoo.com) on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 06:10:55 PM EDT http://www.usalone.com/cgi-bin/petition.cgi?pnum=302

------------------------------------------------------------

Rovian Spin

From another blog http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=18442

"August 09, 2006
Cheney's shot across the bow
White House correspondent Geoff Morrell blogs:

From their vacation homes in Texas and Wyoming, President Bush and Vice President Cheney offered their take -- or better yet, spin -- on Joe Lieberman's defeat. (At left, Lieberman talks to reporters today.)

They suggest it says less about the President's popularity or the war in Iraq than it does about who now controls the Democratic party.

"I know a lot of people have tried to make this a referendum on the president and I would flip it," White House Press Secretary Tony Snow said today. "I think instead it's a defining moment for the Democratic Party, whose national leaders now have made it clear that if you disagree with the extreme left in their party they're going to come after you."

The White House believes the anti-war wing of the Democratic Party has taken over and that will hurt them in the mid terms.

In a call to wire reporters from Jackson Hole, Vice President Cheney blasted liberal Democrats for "purging" his 2000 rival from their party. And he brought up terrorism. Here's the full quote:

"The thing that's partly disturbing about it is the fact that, the standpoint of our adversaries, if you will, in this conflict, and the al Qaeda types, they clearly are betting on the proposition that ultimately they can break the will of the American people in terms of our ability to stay in the fight and complete the task. And when we see the Democratic Party reject one of its own, a man they selected to be their vice presidential nominee just a few short years ago, it would seem to say a lot about the state the party is in today if that's becoming the dominant view of the Democratic Party, the basic, fundamental notion that somehow we can retreat behind our oceans and not be actively engaged in this conflict and be safe here at home, which clearly we know we won't -- we can't be."

He insisted Lieberman's loss is not an indication incumbents are in trouble this November, but he says it's a sure sign that national security will once again be a big issue.

In fact, not long after the White House released a transcript of Cheney's call, the RNC forwarded it to reporters across the country -- clearly trying to seize on divisions and disarray among Democrats."

by WonderWoman on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 08:23:21 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

Lou Dobbs did a poll tonight

and 80+ percent of respondants said they would not vote for incumbants regardless of party affiliation. So regardless of what the sharp shooter spins in the end newcomers like LaMonte will win. The majority of the American people are so fed up with these clowns, regardless, of party, we'll take our chances on who knows what. Anything is better than what we're being tortured by now. Give the chimps a chance but get these fools out.
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 08:53:59 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

Unofficially

that's what I've been hearing too. People are fed up with ALL of those clowns!

by WonderWoman on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 09:35:19 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

And from the Huffington Post

another plausible consideration: the Lieberman campaign was a Rove plan all along, to damage the Democratic party. Doubt it? Check this out:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/detective-story-has-rov_b_26908.html

by WonderWoman on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 08:28:28 PM EDT

: ------------------------------------------------------------

I suspected as much

"We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -- Mahatma Ghandi
by earthymom on Wed Aug 9th, 2006 at 09:49:50 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Rove Supports Lieberman

Anyone want to take bets that it was Rove who took down Lieberman's web site, the night before the election? Of course Joe blamed Ned Lamont's organization. I wrote Joe a letter suggesting he look into the Rove possibility.

BREAKING NEWS -- CNN cuts away from David Gergen, mid-sentence, as he talks about Lieberman's loss and how the public is fed up with Bush's "adventurism"...

Why the cut away?

To report that a London terrorist plot has been discovered and broken up. Only problem is, according to Ron Suskind's "One Percent Doctrine", that plot has been known about for years. Why break the story now?

When CNN came back from the terrorist report, there was no more David Gergen. Instead, they were back in Beirut with a report on how uncooperative Hezbollah is with the media.

mrogers2007@hotmail.com

by mrogers2006 (mrogers2006@hotmail.com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 12:34:09 AM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

I thought the same thing.

Saved by the terrorists - AGAIN. This time we have news focused OFF Joe and OFF the Mid East and OFF Iraq, so the question is, what is REALLY going on? This smacks of Rove's scare tactics. I suspect "the boss" picked up the phone and dialed Tony to tell him to activate "plan B" asap. Do whatever it takes and get the heat off Joe and how most Americans don't like their prez! One reporter from the UK said that they (the UK) "would have preferred to keep watching this group longer so they could have a bigger sweep" BUT they determined the time was NOW. Call me paranoid, but "now" and "imminent threat" can be determined in a lot of ways, by the powers that be...not the least of which would be doodah going to rescue his little puppet from CT.

By the way, I thought doodah was supposedly in Crawford - what was he doing in Greenbay, Wisconsin? Anyone know?

by WonderWoman on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 12:55:46 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Why Now?

Now is the time to ramp up the fear and provide cover for Israel's atrocities which are not playing to well in the ME.

And how lovely for taking the wind out of the sails of the Lamont win... Red Alert!

This is 1984 and the braveneworld of misinformation and created news...

This will amount to nothing but inconvenience for travelers...

by DefJef on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 01:49:56 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

: ------------------------------------------------------------

It's an instant replay of 2004.

And an instant replay of MSM. I got a google alert on Rove today (I keep up with him as best I can, seeing how he is usually behind stuff like this) and I noticed that he spoke FROM Greenbay, Wisconsin, words to the effect that "Joe is a very good friend" (no surprise there.) But WHAT is going on in Wisconsin? So Rove and doodah were together in time for the "terrorist photo op." We should keep a count; we are within the 100 day countdown before the elections. We should monitor what is going on in the world; what negative stuff is emerging about doodah and the neocons; and exactly which "red alert" de jeure they pull out of the hat to distract the media and the public AND where those two are hanging out.
Is something smelling in Wisconsin?

by WonderWoman on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 04:35:19 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

They kooks can't even lie straight anymore

WW, did you hear the number #1 class clown today give his press conference speech. Even he's gotten tired of parroting the talking points and psyops skits. He's brow beaten by his own lies. They're wearing him thin. Class clown #2, Ruddy Guliani, on the Larry King show, kept tripping over his own saliva. They are treading on thin ice, global warming has hit the Neocons spin glaciers and is melting their scare tactics...build the ark the propaganda flood machines are about to rain down on us to wash away Lebanon, Iraq and Lieberman. Oh did you see where unemployment claims rose for the 2nd wk in a row...the economy is starting to crumble. Of course, they don't want us paying attention to those minute domestic issues.
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 09:49:14 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

OK, Joe's Cover Is Blown

He's been a closet Corruptlican all along. Time to come in from the cold.

What? No room in the Inn? The beds are all taken? Filled with the Faithful and their chosen bedmates?

Shit! Well, give him a big stick and send him back over the fence again.

Rampage, divide and destroy, Joe. Do your damndest and if you make it, we'll take care of you.

If you don't, don't worry, we'll see that you get a decent burial and the Mrs. and the kids will be taken care of.

You been a good soldier, Joe. God, George and Karl count on you.

Now, down boy, go! Go! Go! Sic 'em!

(Ya need some help, call me on the private line and we'll send wome money and a few guy around, OK?)

by sirius99 (Aiman) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 12:55:46 AM EDT

: ------------------------------------------------------------

Poor Joe, chosen

to be the sacrificial "lame" duck but someone forgot to pick up the ram.
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 06:56:56 AM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Speaking of CNN,

I saw Wolf Blitzer "interview" (I guess that's what he calls it) Pat Robertson yesterday evening, about his recent trip to Jerusalem to check out the progress of the holy war. Robertson was grinning like the cat that ate the canary---and that metaphor isn't far off the mark. The man is so goddamned delighted that Biblical prophecy is finally coming to pass, and so proud of Olmert for how "calm" he is and how "at peace" during this trying time, and how determined he is to see the mission through----securing the land of Abraham for God's chosen people so that Christ can come again.

I tell you, it's a good thing I don't keep guns in the house, because I'm sure that when I got up this morning I would regret having blown my TV to smithereens.

Cassandra
by Cassandra on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 09:31:56 AM EDT

: ------------------------------------------------------------

I saw that too Cass

didn't he look like Satan in living color? These people are so demonic. Whatever happen to the Christians hating the Jews because the killed their Christ? Get ready everybody next we'll see the image of Christ coming through the clouds via satellite. Olmert is calm because of his military might that the US has supplied Israel with, that's why this mad man is calm. They're a basket of negro toes.
"We must take back our nation from all the people who think that anything that offends them should be removed." - Unknown American
by emah1 on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 12:50:50 PM EDT
[ Parent ]

------------------------------------------------------------

Word of the Day; Distancing

Although it may be just a case of "Vote the rascals out," I believe we're going to see some Olympic quality 'distancing' from Democrats AND those other guys. I'm sure many Dems regret having ever expressed any support for the war. This may indeed be the election that changes the status quo.

by Ghilliad on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 10:14:31 AM EDT http://www.myspace.com/ghilliad

------------------------------------------------------------

Rove and Lieberman dont get it still!

Lamont does. It is that America is under attack by:

OSAMA bin BUSH- The Monstrous Morph Brothers!

Click on the link to see the evidence!

Blog On
PLANET REVOLUTION
by planetpatriot (planetpatriot@gmail.com) on Thu Aug 10th, 2006 at 01:37:33 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

Call it whatever you want

The LaMont win was the first wave of American's overthrowing their disgusting and corrupt government! They know it, and will say anything no matter how bazaar.

Yes, now through Nov. we'll enter the Outer Limits of the Twilight Zone: Lieberman ditching the Dems to win at any cost, and the Repugs ditching the GOP candidate in CT to root for the (Dem) Independent. WTF????

Should I just stick my fingers in my ears till after Nov., or stay tuned and watch the insane hilarity of their tactics? You can literally smell the fear in their words.

by Azgirl7 on Sun Aug 13th, 2006 at 08:39:59 PM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

YES

MQH1 MQH2 MQH3 MQH4 MQH5 MQH6 MQH7 MQH8 MQH9 MQH10 MQH11 MQH12 MQH13 MQH14 MQH15 MQH16 MQH17 MQH18 MQH19 MQH20 MQH21 MQH22 MQH23 MQH24 MQH25 MQH26 MQH27 MQH28 MQH29 MQH30 MQH31 MQH32 MQH33 MQH34 MQH35 MQH36 MQH37 MQH38 MQH39 MQH40 MQH41 MQH42 MQH43 MQH44 MQH45 MQH46 MQH47 MQH48 MQH49 MQH50 MQH51 MQH52 MQH53 MQH54 MQH55 MQH56 MQH57 MQH58 MQH59 MQH60 MQH61 MQH62 MQH63 MQH64 MQH65 MQH66 MQH67 MQH68 MQH69 MQH70 MQH71 MQH72 MQH73 MQH74 MQH75 MQH76 MQH77 MQH78 MQH79 MQH80 MQH81 MQH82 MQH83 MQH84 MQH85 MQH86 MQH87 MQH88 MQH89 MQH90 MQH91 MQH92 MQH93 MQH94 MQH95

by gahame on Sat Aug 19th, 2006 at 06:28:09 AM EDT

------------------------------------------------------------

Re: ffgdfdf

手机铃声铃声下载免费铃声免费铃声下载免费手机铃声下载和弦铃声三星铃声三星手机铃声下载 MP3铃声手机铃声下载手机自编铃声 MP3手机铃声诺基亚铃声下载 NOKIA铃声下载小灵通铃声下载真人铃声 MP3铃声下载自编铃声联通铃声下载移动手机铃声下载联通手机铃声免费下载 TCL铃声飞利浦铃声下载特效铃声搞笑铃声 MIDI铃声铃声图片 MMF铃声下载免费手机图片下载免费手机点歌手机短信手机彩信手机彩铃康佳手机铃声下载 TCL手机铃声下载迪比特手机铃声下载手机和旋铃声三星手机铃声三星手机和弦铃声下载波导手机铃声下载熊猫手机铃声下载免费手机铃声科健手机铃声下载海尔手机铃声下载诺基亚手机铃声下载手机和弦铃声手机铃声图片下载飞利浦手机铃声下载手机自编铃声曲谱小灵通手机铃声下载手机铃声编辑 CDMA手机铃声下载摩托罗拉手机铃声下载联通CDMA手机铃声下载松下手机铃声下载东信手机铃声下载联想手机铃声下载中兴手机铃声下载大显手机铃声下载首信手机铃声下载三星手机自编铃声三星CDMA手机铃声康佳手机和弦铃声 MP3手机铃声下载索尼爱立信手机铃声手机铃声大全三星手机铃声图片下载手机特效铃声手机铃声制作三星手机铃声免费下载 TCL手机自编铃声松下手机自编铃声飞利浦手机自编铃声诺基亚手机自编铃声摩托罗拉自编铃声三星手机MP3铃声手机MP3铃声制作软件免费MP3铃声下载摩托罗拉MP3铃声三星MP3铃声下载联通MP3铃声下载中国移动铃声下载中国联通手机铃声下载免费联通手机铃声联通铃声联通用户手机铃声下载联通手机和弦铃声下载联通手机铃声图片下载小灵通铃声免费下载和弦铃声免费下载免费下载三星铃声诺基亚免费铃声下载联通免费铃声下载免费铃声图片下载 MMF铃声免费下载 TCL免费铃声下载免费下载铃声手机铃声免费下载松下免费铃声下载 NOKIA免费铃声下载 MIDI铃声免费下载和弦铃声下载 TCL免费手机铃声下载免费手机铃声图片下载免费手机铃声下载网站小灵通手机铃声免费下载诺基亚手机铃声免费下载摩托罗拉手机铃声免费下载三星和弦铃声 CECT和弦铃声下载三星T108和弦铃声 NOKIA和弦铃声下载康佳和弦铃声下载迪比特和弦铃声下载阿尔卡特和弦铃声 CDMA和弦铃声下载夏新和弦铃声下载西门子和弦铃声诺基亚和弦铃声联通和弦铃声三星铃声下载三星和旋铃声三星T108铃声下载三星手机铃声乐园三星CDMA铃声下载三星免费铃声三星真人铃声诺基亚3100铃声下载 NOKIA手机铃声下载怎样下载小灵通铃声真人铃声下载真人真唱手机铃声下载联通用户铃声下载联通CDMA铃声下载 TCL手机铃声图片下载 TCL手机和弦铃声下载飞利浦630铃声下载三星特效铃声手机特效铃声下载搞笑短信 MMF手机铃声 MMF格式铃声免费短信短信笑话幽默短信经典短信谜语短信短信祝福爆笑短信生日短信爱情短信精彩短信情人节短信短信传情节日短信彩信图片彩信动画彩信相册免费彩信下载三星彩信联通彩信移动彩信彩信铃声免费彩铃下载移动彩铃联通彩铃 12530彩铃小灵通彩铃免费三星手机铃声免费和弦铃声手机图铃下载免费图铃下载待机彩图三星手机待机彩图丰胸铃声网络游戏免费游戏下载小游戏在线游戏游戏外挂游戏论坛游戏点卡联众游戏泡泡堂游戏游戏攻略 FLASH游戏单机游戏下载美女美女图片美女写真美女论坛性感美女美女走光街头走光走光照片免费电影下载免费在线电影免费电影在线观看小电影免费成人电影免费激情电影电影论坛 PP点点通电影下载

by shuangcer on Thu Sep 14th, 2006 at 05:06:21 AM EDT

Rove offers to help Lieberman (seriously)

< Should We Care? (41 comments) | Regarding the alleged terror plot (43 comments) >

Login

Recent Diaries

It's the War, Stupid!
by anna shane - September 15
17 comments

Poisons
by TJ - September 15
1 comment

Hide the thimble
by xog - September 15
8 comments

House Backs 700 Mile Fence Along Border With Mexico
by ezdidit - September 15
1 comment

Ohio Prisons
by gjstoker - September 15
12 comments

"Bush is a heretic in the Christian Church." I just ...
by keyricster - September 14
5 comments

My first entry091406
by MotherBear - September 14
7 comments

Torture is Torture, Right?
by planetpatriot - September 14
21 comments

Sad
by Sunshine - September 14
9 comments

WOMEN: open thread
by Tiny Wits - September 14
55 comments

Why the Republicans Rule
by Salvo - September 13
65 comments

Open Letter To Susan--Making Bush-Cheney Null & Void
by stephen - September 13
14 comments

A reply to the GOP on national security and defense.
by buckfush - September 13
2 comments

BORING!!!!!
by Tiger - September 12
77 comments

Dalai Lama Center for Peace and Education
by SlowDown - September 12
5 comments

Where is the outrage?
by Greta - September 12
55 comments

What if the WTC had NOT fallen???
by jbyopa - September 12
73 comments

Without a Shot Fired: The Dustin Brim Story
by populistamerica - September 11

The Rest Of The World Mourns 9-11 Also
by sirius99 - September 11
28 comments

Touchstone
by SagamoreBear - September 11
6 comments

More Diaries...

Rove offers to help Lieberman (seriously)

By WilliamPitt

Menu

Login

Related Links

Recent Diaries

Blogroll